Systems Engineering for Leagile Ship Repair: An Arctic Experimental Study

Ahmed Ghowel, Siti Zaleha Bte Omain

Abstract


Global trade increasingly relies on maritime transport, and Arctic shipping routes— linking the Atlantic and Pacific via the Northern Sea Route—are emerging as strategic corridors, projected to handle 10–15% of global maritime trade by mid-century. As competition intensifies between major players such as China, Russia, and the ICE Pact (a trilateral partnership between the United States, Canada and Finland), Arctic shipyards must be strategically positioned to offer timely, efficient, and high-quality ship repairservices. These capabilities are critical to enhancing operational continuity and increasing the competitiveness of Arctic shipping operations. Despite investments in specialised icebreaker fleets, the demand for robust, adaptive, and digitally enabled ship repair services remains urgent. Ship repair operations are inherently unpredictable, often disrupted by changing inspection outcomes and shifting customer requirements. These uncertainties can severely affect scheduling, resource allocation, and production planning—posing risks to continuous Arctic operations. To address these challenges, this study proposes an integrated Leagile strategy that combines Lean principles for efficiency with Agile practices for flexibility. Central to this strategy is the use of SysML (Systems Modelling Language) to structure, model, and support system-wide decision-making and process optimisation across a ship repair shipyard, achieving time efficiency and cost benefits. A usage of an experimental case study to demonstrate the practical application of this approach The integration of Leagile practices with SysML modelling offers a robust framework for navigating the complex demands of Arctic ship repair. This approach enhances responsiveness to disruptions, improves planning accuracy, and minimises non-value-added activities. It also strengthens collaboration across technical and managerial domains, supporting a more synchronised and data-driven operation. In summary, the proposed Leagile structure through SysML enables Arctic shipyards to deliver faster, more innovative, and more resilient repair services. This positions them as vital enablers of uninterrupted Arctic shipping, advancing both regional capabilities and global maritime resilience. 

Keywords


ICE PACT- Leagile- Lean-Agile- System Engineering- Systems Modelling Language (SysML) -Shipyard- Ship repair- Ship Maintenance-Arctic.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Berkowitz, H., & Borch, O. J. (2021). Sustainable Arctic maritime logistics: The role of digitalisation. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1802785

Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014). Can Agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development? Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21–34. Dawson, J., Pizzolato, L., Howell, S. E., Copland, L., & Johnston, M. E. (2020). Temporal and spatial patterns of ship traffic in the Canadian Arctic from 1990 to 2015. Arctic, 71(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic4698

Friedenthal, S., Moore, A., & Steiner, R. (2014). A practical guide to SysML: The systems modelling language (3rd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. García-Alcaraz, J. L., Maldonado-Macías, A. A., & Cortés-Robles, G. (Eds.). (2020). Lean manufacturing in the developing world: Methodology, case studies and trends from Latin America. Springer International Publishing. Ghowel, S., & Ahmed. (2021, November). The concept of floating shipyard [Paper presentation]. Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition & Conference, Abu Dhabi, UAE. https://doi.org/10.2118/207538- MS

Gustafsson, J. (2017). Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study. Academy of Business, Engineering and Science, Halmstad University. Highsmith, J. (2002). Agile software development ecosystems. Addison-Wesley. Holt, J., & Perry, S. (2019). SysML for systems engineering: A model-based approach (3rd ed.). The Institution of Engineering and Technology. INCOSE. (2015). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. Jensen, Ø. (2022). The International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (Polar Code). In The law of the sea and polar maritime delimitation and jurisdiction (pp. 357–370). Routledge. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. Khan, O., Daddi, T., & Slabbinck, H. (2022). SysML for sustainable maritime supply chains: A case study on Arctic shipping. Sustainability, 14(5), 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052563

Lasserre, F. (2021). Arctic shipping: A contrasted expansion in a warming region. Polar Geography, 44(2), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2021.1902862

Madni, A. M., & Sievers, M. (2018). Model-based systems engineering: Motivation, current status, and research opportunities. Systems Engineering, 21(3), 172–190. Martínez-Jurado, P. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2014). Lean management in shipbuilding: A case study. Journal of Ship Production and Design, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5957/JSPD.30.1.130001

Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the Lean and Agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1–2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00223-0

Object Management Group (OMG). (2017). OMG systems modelling language (OMG SysML®), version 1.6. Pawling, R., Andrews, D., & Eriksson, D. (2019). Using SysML for early-stage ship design decision support. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(3), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse7030072

Renganathan, S., Bhuvanesh, A., & Karunakaran, D. (2021). A SysML-based approach for modelling and simulation of complex marine systems maintenance. Ships and Offshore Structures.

Rødseth, Ø., Burmeister, H. C., & Porathe, T. (2020). Towards Agile shipping: Adaptive maintenance planning using real-time data. Ocean Engineering, 216, 108080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108080

Sanders, D., Elangeswaran, C., & Wulfsberg, J. P. (2021). Industry 4.0 and Lean management – Synergy or contradiction? A systematic literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management.

Stank, T., Esper, T., Goldsby, T. J., Zinn, W., & Autry, C. W. (2019). Toward a digitally dominant paradigm for twenty-first century supply chain scholarship. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(10), 956–971.

Vinodh, S., & Joy, D. (2012). Structural equation modelling of Lean manufacturing practices in an automotive component manufacturing organisation. International Journal of Production Research, 50(22), 6508–6520.

Wang, J., Wang, H., & He, J. (2019). Research on the application of the critical path method in shipbuilding project schedule management. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 563(4), 042058.

Weilkiens, T. (2016). Systems engineering with SysML/UML: Modelling, analysis, design. Morgan Kaufmann OMG Press.

Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Zhou, L., Zhao, C., & Li, Z. (2023). A hybrid Lean–Agile scheduling model for complex engineering projects under uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21622/MARLOG.2026.15.1.112

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmed Ghowel, Siti Zaleha Bte Omain

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The International Maritime Transport and Logistics Journal (MARLOG)

E-ISSN: 2974-3141
P-ISSN: 2974-3133

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt