Developing an Operations Management Optimization Model for Strategic Positioning of East Port Said in Global Trade Networks

Dalia Younis

Abstract


This study develops an Operations Management Optimization Model to enhance the strategic positioning of East Port Said within global trade networks. The research integrates statistical analysis, scenario simulation, and mathematical optimization to improve operational efficiency, reduce vessel turnaround time, optimize berth utilization, and minimize operational costs. Data were collected from historical port records, vessel schedules, and cargo throughput, supplemented by simulated scenarios to validate the model. The proposed model uses a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) framework for berth allocation, crane assignment, and resource scheduling. Key performance indicators (KPIs) were analysed, including vessel turnaround time, berth utilization, cargo throughput, and operational cost per TEU. Simulation results demonstrate that: Adding 2 additional cranes reduced average vessel turnaround time from 22 ± 4 hours to 18 ± 3.5 hours. Berth utilization increased from 75% ± 8% to 78% ± 6% under optimized allocation. Cargo throughput improved from 10,000 ± 1,200 TEU/day to 11,500 ± 1,100 TEU/day. Operational cost per TEU decreased from $120 to $118. These results confirm that strategic resource allocation and infrastructure improvements significantly enhance port performance. The model provides a decision-support tool for port authorities to optimize operations and strengthen East Port Said’s competitiveness in global maritime trade, while offering insights into efficient logistics planning under variable operational conditions. 

Keywords


Operations Management, Optimization Model, East Port Said, Port Efficiency, Global Trade Networks, Vessel Turnaround Time, Berth Utilization, Cargo Throughput

Full Text:

PDF

References


African Union. (2019). Agreement Establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area. African Union.

Ambrosino, D., & Xie, H. (2022). Optimization Approaches for Defining Storage Strategies in Maritime Container Terminals. Soft Computing, 27(7), 4125–4137.

Bichou, K., & Gray, R. (2005). A critical review of conventional terminology for classifying seaports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 39(1), 75–92.

De, A., Pratap, S., Kumar, A., & Tiwari, M. K. (2020). A hybrid dynamic berth allocation planning problem with fuel cost considerations for a container terminal port using a chemical reaction optimization approach. Annals of Operations Research, 290(1), 783–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-3070-1 .

Filom, S. (2022). Applications of machine learning methods in port operations: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

Golias, M. M., Saharidis, G. K., Boile, M., Theofanis, S., & Ierapetritou, M. G. (2009). The berth allocation problem: Optimizing vessel arrival time. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 11(4), 358–377. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2009.12

Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2021). Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management (13th ed.). Pearson.

Imai, A., Nishimura, E., & Papadimitriou, S. (2001). The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port. Transportation Research Part B, 35, 401–417.

Iris, C., Pacino, D., Ropke, S., & Larsen, A. (2015). Integrated berth allocation and quay crane assignment problem: Set partitioning models and computational results. Transportation Research Part E, 81, 75–97.

Khazna, (Year). An optimization approach for the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports.

Kurniawan, F., Musa, S. N., Moin, N. H., & Sahroni, T. R. (2022). A systematic review of factors influencing container terminals’ performance. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15(2), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0490339.

Lai, K. K., & Shih, K. (1992). A study of container berth allocation. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 26, 45–60.

Lam, J. S. L., & Su, S. (2015). Disruption risks and mitigation strategies: An analysis of Asian ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 42(5), 415–435.

Lam, J. S. L., & Su, S. (2018). Disruption risks and mitigation strategies: An analysis of Asian ports. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(2), 201–222.

Laju, I. K., Kurniadi, D., Krisnawati, L., & Wirahadi, K. W. (2024). Optimizing port operations: A literature review of the relationship between facility management, human resources, licensing, loading and unloading productivity, and port performance in maritime transportation. Jurnal Multidisiplin Riset Ilmiah, 1(2), 31–42.

Lai Ruiz, E. (2024). Greening container terminals through optimization. Journal of Cleaner Production.

Lee, D. H., & Chen, Y. C. (2008). An optimization heuristic for the berth scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research.

Li, B. (2023). Berth allocation and scheduling at marine container terminals. Journal of Container & Development Economics, 10(4), 1707–? https://doi.org/10.1093/jcde/7222902

Liu, X., Yang, D., Yuen, K. F., & Wu, J. (2022). A deep learning approach for port congestion estimation and prediction. Maritime Policy & Management, 50(7), 835–860. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2040123

Martin Iradi, B., Pacino, D., & Ropke, S. (2020). The Multi-Port Berth Allocation Problem with Speed Optimization: Exact Methods and a Cooperative Game Analysis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.15085

Martin Iradi, B., Pacino, D., & Ropke, S. (2023). An adaptive large neighborhood search heuristic for the multi-port continuous berth allocation problem. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02356

Mili, K. (2024). Optimizing container terminal operations: A comparative analysis of hierarchical and integrated solution approaches. TransNav: The International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.18.04.09826

Miyauchi, Y., Sawada, R., Akimoto, Y., Umeda, N., & Maki, A. (2021). Optimization of the planning of the trajectory and control of autonomous berthing and unberthing for realistic port geometry. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02459

Nazri, S. N. A., et al. (2024). Optimization of berth allocation in container terminals. Journal (name to be inserted).

Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2020). The corporate geography of global container terminal operators. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(6), 753–772.

Rao, A. R. (2025). Predictive analysis for optimizing port operations. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 2877. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15062877

Ramirez Polo, L. E., Caicedo Solano, N. E., & Sabbagh Balaguer, M. (2025). Black box simulation-based optimization for berth allocation in multipurpose ports: A case study in Colombia. Maritime Business Review, 10(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-10-2024-0078

Rodrigue, J. P., & Notteboom, T. (2013). The geography of cruises: Itineraries, not destinations. Applied Geography, 38, 31–42.

Suez Canal Authority. (2021). Annual Report 2021. Suez Canal Authority.

UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2022). Review of Maritime Transport 2022. United Nations.

UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development). (2023). Review of Maritime Transport 2023. United Nations.

Wardana, G. A. (2024). Implications for maritime logistics sustainability. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Science and Engineering. (Pages to be checked)

Wang, Y., & Cullinane, K. (2016). Determinants of port competitiveness: A global analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 95, 84–97.

Weerasinghe, B. A., Perera, H. N., & Bai, X. (2024). Optimizing container terminal operations: A systematic review of operations research applications. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 26(2), 307–341.




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21622/MARLOG.2026.15.1.99

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Dalia Younis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The International Maritime Transport and Logistics Journal (MARLOG)

E-ISSN: 2974-3141
P-ISSN: 2974-3133

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt