Is cold ironing (onshore power supply, or alternative maritime power, or shore-to-ship power): a viable solution for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in ports? EU / Greek ports perspective

Emmanouil Nikolaidis, Marina Maniati

Abstract


Adaptation to climate change has led Institutional bodies to work relentlessly to find solutions to this progressing problem. European Union has been diligently formulating a comprehensive institutional framework aimed at addressing maritime transport’s environmental impact and fostering sustainable practices. Maritime transport, responsible for approximately 75% of the Union’s external trade and 31% of its internal trade by volume, plays a pivotal role in the economy of the Union. However, it also accounts for a significant portion of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions within the EU, contributing around 11% of all EU CO2 emissions from transport and 3 to 4% of total CO2 emissions in the EU.

In response to the pressing need to curb emissions, Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) set a clear objective for the net reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55% compared to 1990 levels by 2030. Moreover, this regulation places the Union on a trajectory towards achieving net zero GHG emissions by 2050. As part of this commitment, complementary policies have been introduced to expedite the adoption of sustainably produced renewable and low-carbon fuels in the maritime transport sector, all while respecting technological neutrality.

Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 requires the port to be able to provide shore-side electricity supply for at least 90% of container vessels over 5,000 GT, ro-ro passenger ships and high-speed passenger craft over 5,000 gt, and passenger ships over 5,000 gt, provided the annual average number of ships in each of these categories exceeds 100, 40 and 25 respectively. However, the lack of a common methodology for setting targets and adopting measures in national policies led to significant differences in the levels of ambition between Member States which was perceived as a hindrance to the establishment of a comprehensive network of alternative fuel infrastructure.

The paper examines the most important obstacles and towards EU legislative framework implementation and techno-economic challenges. 

 

Received 25 May 2024

Accepted: 04 June 2024

Published: 26 June 2024


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdaoui, A. (2021) ‘Feasibility study of cold ironing from renewable sources in the Nordic region: case study : Port of Kapellskär in Stockholm’. World Maritime University Dissertations. 1665. https://commons.wmu. se/all_dissertations/1665

Bernacchi, R. (2017) ‘From Shore-to-ship to smart ports: Balancing demand and supply and optimizing capital expenditures. White paper’. Available at: https://search.abb. com/library/Download.aspx?Document ID=9AKK1070 45A4337& LanguageCode = en&DocumentPartId = &Action=Launch

Coppola, T., Fantauzzi, M., Miranda, S. and Quaranta, F. (2016) ‘Cost/benefit analysis of alternative systems for feeding electric energy to ships in port from ashore’. 2016 AEIT International Annual Conference (AEIT), Capri, Italy, 1-7, doi: 10.23919/AEIT.2016.7892782.

European Sea Ports Organisation (ESPO)(2021) ‘ESPO Green Guide 2021. A Manual for European Ports Towards a Green Future’. Available at: https://www.espo.be/media/ESPO%20Green%20Guide%202021%20-%20 FINAL.pdf

GAUSS mbH (Institute for Environmental Protection and Safety in Shipping) (2009) ‘Study of the Feasibility of Shore-Side Power Supply for the Ports of the Hanseatic City of Bremen. Summary of Findings’. Available at: https://sustainableworldports.org/wp-content/uploads/Study-of-the-Feasability-of-Shore-Side-Power-Supply-for-the-Ports-of-the-Haneatic-City-of-Bremen.pdf

Gemeente Rotterdam and Port of Rotterdam (2021) ‘Strategy for Shore Power in the Port of Rotterdam’. Available at: https://www.portofrotterdam.com/sites/default/files/2021-05/strategy-for-shore-power-in-the-port-of-rotterdam.pdf

Karapidakis, E., Nikolaidis, E., Moraitakis, G., Georgakis, F. and Papadakis, M. (2022) ‘Cold ironing feasibility study at the Heraklion port’. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2339, 012016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2339/1/012016

Karimpour, R. and Lara Lopez, J. M. (2022) ‘EALING – European flagship action for cold ironing in ports. Executive Summary on Ports Questionnaire’. Available at: https://ealingproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Port-Questionnaires-Executive-Summary.pdf

Lacey, L., Brewster, P. and Fallen Bailey, D.(2019) ‘The Development of Alternative Fuel Infrastructure in Irish Ports; A Feasibility Study’. Irish Maritime Development Office, Dublin, Ireland

Marinacci, C., Masala, R., Ricci, S. and Tieri, A., (2013) ‘Technical-Economical Analysis of Cold-Ironing: Case Study of Venice Cruise Terminal’. V International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, MARINE 2013. Hamburg, Germany,

- 31 May.

Nikolaidis Emm, Maniati M, (2023), Cost Benefit Analysis on the Electrification in the Port of Heraklion, CEF Project ELECTRIPORT

Strachinescu, A. (2021) ‘Green Deal support for the Green Ports’. Decarbonising Small and Medium Ports Event, 7 July. Available at: https://portodeaveiro.pt/webinar-decarbonising-small-medium-ports/pdfs/session-three/2-Green-Deal-support-for-the-Green-Ports-Andreea-Strachinescu.pdf

Tseng, P.-H. and Pilcher, N. (2015) ‘A study of the potential of shore power for the port of Kaohsiung, Taiwan: to introduce or not to introduce?’ Research in Transportation Business & Management, 17, 83-91, ISSN 2210-5395, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. rtbm.2015.09.001.

Wang, H., Mao, X. and Rutherford, D. (2015) ‘White Paper. Costs and benefits of shore power at the port of Shenzhen’. International Council on Clean Transportation, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Available at: https://theicct.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/ICCT-WCtr_ ShorePower_201512a.pdf

Wilske, A. (2009) ‘Examining the Commercial Viability of Cold Ironing’. Available at: https://sustainableworldports.org/wp-content/uploads/Port-of-Gothenburg-Examining-the-Commercial-Viability-of-Cold-Ironing-2009.pdf

Wooley, D., Jones, B., Cheung, A. and Brito, J. (2021) ‘Final Report. Maritime Port Clean Energy Infrastructure Jobs Study’. Available at: https://oceanconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Maritime-Port-Clean-Energy-Infrastructure-Jobs-Study.pdf

Zanne, M. and Twrdy, E. (2021) ‘The Economic Feasibility of Port Air Emissions Reduction Measures: The Case Study of the Port of Koper’.

Zis, T. (2019) ‘Prospects of cold ironing as an emissions reduction option’. Transportation Research. Part A: Policy & Practice, 119, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.003




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21622/MACI.2024.01.1.915

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Emmanouil Nikolaidis, Marina Maniati


Multidisciplinary Adaptive Climate Insights

E-ISSN: 3009-6332

P-ISSN: 3009-7924

 

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt

maci@aast.edu