A comprehensive study of travel mode captivity: a nuanced perspective on car captivity in new Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
The distinction between 'captive' and 'choice' user categories has long been a prevalent framework in transportation literature and planning circles. While 'captive' users rely on a sole mode, 'choice' users intentionally choose a particular mode based on perceived benefits. However, this binary classification is increasingly critiqued for its failure to capture the complexities of non-transit users. This study delves into a nuanced perspective on car dependency, focusing on the degree of attachment to cars, and aims to categorize car-captive individuals beyond traditional definitions. Examining the feasibility and implications of such categorization, this research adopts a tailored approach within the context of New Cairo, Egypt. An online geo-referenced survey was employed to measure car dependency potential clustering. The survey encompassed demographic information, travel behaviours, car dependency motives, and experimental travel mode change scenarios. Participants were deliberately selected from a comparable built environment to mitigate external factors' influence. Data analysis involved descriptive and inferential statistics, including Chi-Square tests, with IBM SPSS Statistics 22 used for two-step clustering. Iterative efforts aimed to establish a cohesive model, with emphasis on specific variables which exhibited the highest values. In conclusion, this study proposed two other clusters, ‘car reluctant’ and ‘car inclined’ which differ in their level of attachment to car. By exploring potential categorizations beyond the conventional binary, this research contributes to urban planning and transportation design, fostering a more sustainable and user-centric mobility system. Also, it offers insights into the choice dynamics and the rigid concept of "car captivity."
Received: 12 November 2023
Accepted: 30 December 2023
Published: 26 February 2024
Full Text:
PDFReferences
M. M. Abdel Wahed Ahmed and N. Abd El Monem, “Sustainable and green transportation for better quality of life case study greater Cairo – Egypt,” HBRC Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 17–37, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1080/16874048.2020.1719340.
American Public Transportation Association, “Glossary.” Accessed: Aug. 08, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.apta.com/services/safety/glossary.cfm#c
E. A. Beimborn, M. J. Greenwald, and X. Jin, “Accessibility, Connectivity, and Captivity: Impacts on Transit Choice,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1835, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.3141/1835-01.
R. Cervero and C. Radisch, “Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods,” Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 127–141, Jul. 1996, doi: 10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9.
M. Elharoun, S. M. El-Badawy, and U. E. Shahdah, “Captivity impact on modelling mode choice behavior,” Advances in Transportation Studies, vol. 53, 2021, doi: 10.4399/97912804143426.
D. Fang, Y. Xue, J. Cao, and S. Sun, “Exploring satisfaction of choice and captive bus riders: An impact asymmetry analysis,” Transp Res D Transp Environ, vol. 93, p. 102798, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2021.102798.
Egypt. Cairo Governorate, “New Cairo Demographics.” Accessed: Aug. 01, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://www.cairo.gov.eg /ar/Statistics/elmodonElgadida_2020.pdf
I. R. Hegazy and W. S. Moustafa, “Toward revitalization of new towns in Egypt case study: Sixth of October,” International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 10–18, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.07.002.
I. Ghonimi Ibrahim, “THE IMPACTS OF NEIGHBORHOOD LAND USE PATTERNS ON RESIDENT’S SATISFACTION AND PERCEPTION TO SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARISON OF FOUR NEIGHBORHOODS IN GREATER CAIRO REGION EGYPT,” JES. Journal of Engineering Sciences, vol. 45, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.21608/jesaun.2017.116349.
C. Jacques, K. Manaugh, and A. M. El-Geneidy, “Rescuing the captive [mode] user: an alternative approach to transport market segmentation,” Transportation (Amst), vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 625–645, May 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11116-012-9437-2.
K. Krizek and A. El-Geneidy, “Segmenting Preferences and Habits of Transit Users and Non-Users,” J Public Trans, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 71–94, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.10.3.5.
G. Lansley, “Cars and socio-economics: understanding neighbourhood variations in car characteristics from administrative data,” Reg Stud Reg Sci, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 264–285, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/21681376.2016.1177466.
G. Megahed, A. Elshater, and S. M. Z. Afifi, “Competencies urban planning students need to succeed in professional practices,” Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 267–287, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.1108/ARCH-02-2019-0027.
M. J. Norušis, “SPSS statistics 17.0: Statistical procedures companion,” Journal of Business ethics, vol. 2, no. 13, 2008.
S. E. Polzin, X. Chu, and J. R. Rey, “Density and Captivity in Public Transit Success: Observations from the 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Study,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1735, no. 1, pp. 10–18, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.3141/1735-02.
S. Rundle-Thiele, K. Kubacki, A. Tkaczynski, and J. Parkinson, “Using two-step cluster analysis to identify homogeneous physical activity groups,” Marketing Intelligence & Planning, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 522–537, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1108/MIP-03-2014-0050.
P. A. Singleton, “Validating the Satisfaction with Travel Scale as a measure of hedonic subjective well-being for commuting in a U.S. city,” Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, vol. 60, pp. 399–414, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.029.
H. Tiikkaja and H. Liimatainen, “Car access and travel behaviour among men and women in car deficient households with children,” Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect, vol. 10, p. 100367, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2021.100367.
S. von Behren, C. Minster, M. Magdolen, B. Chlond, M. Hunecke, and P. Vortisch, “Bringing Travel Behavior and Attitudes Together: an Integrated Survey Approach for Clustering Urban Mobility Types,” Transportatio Reseach Record, no. January, 2018.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21622/resd.2024.10.1.751
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rana Swelam, Marwa Khalifa, Nabil Mohareb, Yasser Moustafa, Sami Affifi
Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development
E-ISSN: 2356-8569
P-ISSN: 2356-8518
Published by:
Academy Publishing Center (APC)
Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)
Alexandria, Egypt