Influence of shared and innovative mobility on psychological wellbeing
Abstract
Recently, new travel options such as micromobility and shared transport systems have been introduced in many urban areas in Spain, which are intended to increase the sustainability and accessibility of cities. The Covid-19 pandemic has boost the use of these new individual travel modes.
In this conference paper, travel behavior and wellbeing of users of this new urban solutions compared to traditional transport modes are analyzed.
Face-to-face and online surveys were carried out during the Summer of 2021 in Valencia (Spain) to collect information regarding travel behavior and wellbeing. Participants were habitual users of all urban travel modes, including those who also used motosharing, carsharing or private e-scooters. Satisfaction with Travel Scale (STS) is used to explore subjective wellbeing of users of new and traditional transport modes.
Results show that current users of motosharing and private e-scooters were former users of public transport, while users of carsharing used to utilize more car and motosharing before. On the other hand, active transport is associated with higher satisfaction compared to new urban modes, while they provide more satisfaction than urban public transport.
Received: 16 November 2023
Accepted: 10 March 2024
Published: 27 March 2024
Full Text:
PDFReferences
C. S. Levesque, G. C. Williams, D. Elliot, M. A. Pickering, B. Bodenhamer, and P. J. Finley, ‘Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors’, Health Educ Res, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 691–702, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1093/her/cyl148.
A. H. , & W. A. D. Yentes, ‘Use of the satisfaction with travel scale across diverse travel modes and trip purposes’, Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, vol. 79, pp. 250–259, 2021.
D. Västfjäll, M. Friman, T. Gärling, and M. Kleiner, ‘The measurement of core affect: A Swedish self-report measure derived from the affect circumplex’, Scand J Psychol, vol. 43, no. 1, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-9450.00265.
V. R. Smith, ‘Transportation, activity space, and subjective wellbeing: How the environment determines when travel enhances subjective well-being’, J Transp Geogr, vol. 64, pp. 181–193, 2017.
L. Reardon and S. Abdallah, ‘Well-being and Transport: Taking Stock and Looking Forward’, Transp Rev, vol. 33, no. 6, 2013, doi: 10.1080/01441647.2013.837117.
J. A. Russell, ‘Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion’, Psychol Rev, vol. 110, no. 1, 2003, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145.
J. A. Russell, ‘A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology’, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1161–1178, 1980.
L. E. , G. T. , & E. D. Olsson, ‘A comparison of the satisfaction with travel scale and the day reconstruction method’, Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 686–695, 2012.
S. Nordbakke and T. Schwanen, ‘Well-being and Mobility: A Theoretical Framework and Literature Review Focusing on Older People’, Mobilities, vol. 9, no. 1. 2014. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2013.784542.
D. P. MacKinnon, G. Warsi, and J. H. Dwyer, ‘A Simulation Study of Mediated Effect Measures’, Multivariate Behav Res, vol. 30, no. 1, 1995, doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3.
C. S. Levesque, G. C. Williams, D. Elliot, M. A. Pickering, B. Bodenhamer, and P. J. Finley, ‘Validating the theoretical structure of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ) across three different health behaviors’, Health Education Research, vol. 22, no. 5. 2007. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl148.
M. Friman, S. Fujii, D. Ettema, T. Gärling, and L. E. Olsson, ‘Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale’, Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, vol. 48, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.012.
D. Ettema, T. Gärling, L. E. Olsson, M. Friman, and S. Moerdijk, ‘The road to happiness: Measuring Dutch car drivers’ satisfaction with travel’, Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 27, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.12.006.
D. Ettema, T. Gärling, L. Eriksson, M. Friman, L. E. Olsson, and S. Fujii, ‘Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool’, Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav, vol. 14, no. 3, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2010.11.002.
D. Ettema, T. Gärling, L. E. Olsson, and M. Friman, ‘Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being’, Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, vol. 44, no. 9, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.005.
A. Delbosc, ‘The role of well-being in transport policy’, Transp Policy (Oxf), vol. 23, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.06.005.
J. , S. T. , V. A. V. , W. F. , & M. P. De Vos, ‘Travel and subjective wellbeing: A focus on findings, methods and future research needs’, Transp Rev, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 93–112, 2015.
Y. , Z. H. , & C. X. Chen, ‘The relationship between daily travel and subjective wellbeing: A comparative study of car-dependent cities and public transport-oriented cities’, Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, vol. 74, pp. 71–85, 2015.
M. Abou-Zeid, ‘Impact of commuting mode choice on commuting satisfaction and wellbeing: Evidence from the Montreal metropolitan region’, Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 692–709, 2009.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21622/resd.2024.10.1.757
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Rosa Arroyo López, Tomás Ruiz Sánchez, Lidón Mars Aicart
Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development
E-ISSN: 2356-8569
P-ISSN: 2356-8518
Published by:
Academy Publishing Center (APC)
Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)
Alexandria, Egypt