Container Moves Per Lift: The Impact Of Spreader Technology On Bay Time

Shmuel Z. Yahalom, Changqian Guan, Elizabeth Langmaid

Abstract


The trend of increasing containership size (length, beam, and draft) continues. The increase in containership size, especially beam size (bay size), increased berth and port time at a given number of lifts per hour. There are emerging technologies that allow a spreader of ship-to-shore gantry to handle multiple containers in a single lift. This paper studies the impact of the increase in the containership bay size on berth time and the role the spreader of gantry cranes can play in keeping up with the increase of bay size, thus reducing vessel port time. The paper analyzes the moves of containers per lift with different spreader technologies, where a spreader can handle one or multiple containers in one lift. The paper determines the combination of spreader technology needed to accommodate mega containerships with large bay sizes in order to reduce vessel port time. After a literature review, using the bay time determination method developed by the authors, the paper analyzes the moves per lift of different spreader technologies, vessel operations and containership bay size configurations. The analysis determines the optimal combination of equipment to comply with liner service schedules and the difficulties the equipment might pose on a marine container terminal. 

Keywords


containership bay size, Bay time, Gantry crane container lift, Gantry crane container moves per lift, Containership beam size, Spreader technology, Ports of call schedule, Mega containership

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bartosek, A., Marek, O., 2013, Quay Cranes in

Container Terminals. Transaction of Transport

Sciences. Volume 6, 9-18.

Chao, Shih-Liang., and Lin, Yu., 2011, Evaluating

advanced quay cranes in container terminals.

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and

Transportation Review, Vol. 47, Issue 4, 432-445.

Choi H., S, Won H., S, & Lee, C., 2013,

Comparison of alternative ship-to-yard vehicles

with the consideration of the batch process of

quay cranes. International Journal of Industrial

Engineering. 20(1-2), 84-98.

Choi, S., Im, H., and Lee, C., 2014, Development

of an operating system for optimization of the

container terminal by using tandem-lift quay

crane. Future Information Technology, 399-404

Choo, Shawn, Diego Klabjan and David Simchi-

Levi, 2010, Multiship Crane Sequencing with Yard

Congestion Constraints, Transportation Science,

Vol. 44, No. 1 (February), pp. 98-115

Delgado A., Jensen R.M., Janstrup K., Rose TH.,

Andersen K.H., 2012, A constraint programming

model for fast optimal stowage of container vessel

bays. European Journal of Operational Research,

(1), 251-261.

Diabat, Theodorou, A, E., 2014, An integrated

quay crane assignment and scheduling problem.

Computers & Industrial Engineering, 73:115-123

Goodchild, A. V., 200, Crane double cycling

in container ports: algorithms, evaluation, and

planning, PhD dissertation, University of California,

Berkeley.

Goodchild, A. V., & Daganzo, C. F., 2006,

Double-cycling strategies for container ships

and their effect on ship loading and unloading

operations. Transportation Science, 40(4), 473–

Goodchild, A. V., & Daganzo, C. F., 2007,

Crane double cycling in container ports: Planning

methods and evaluation. Transportation Research

Part B, 41(8), 875–891.

Hay, Cameron, 2016, Trends in multiple lifting,

Spreader Container, World Port Development,

International Journal For Port Management, June,

https://www.ramspreaders.com/wp-content/

uploads/2016/07/ WPDSingFlex-Tandem-40-

Headblock-June-2016.pdf

Huang X., Shi F., Zhang H., 2012, SVM-Based Fuzzy

Rules Acquisition System for Twin-Lift Spreader

System, Chapter 9, 75-81. In: Wang X., Wang F.,

Zhong S. (eds) Electrical, Information Engineering

and Mechatronics 2011. Lecture Notes in Electrical

Engineering, vol 138. Springer, London. Retrieved

from https://link-springer-com.sunymaritime.

idm.oclc.org/chapter /10.1007%2F978-1-4471-

-2_9

Hyongmo, J., 2015, The era of mega vessels and

challenges to ports. Pacific Economic Cooperation

Council, October, Retrieved from https://www. pecc.org/resources/infrastructure-1/2289-the-

era-of-mega-vessels-andchallenges-to-port/

file

Jiang Xinjia, , Ek Peng and Loo Hay Lee, 2015,

Innovative Container Terminals to Improve Global

Container Transport Chains, Chapter 1 in Lee

Chung Yee and Qiang Meng, (2015) Handbook

of Ocean Container Transport Logistics, Making

Global Supply Chain Effective, International Series

in Operations Research & Management Science,

Springer. 15. Johansen Robert S., 2007, Twin-

Container Operations ... The Landside Part

of the Equation, AAPA Facilities Engineering

Seminar, JWD Group, A division of DMJM Harris,

November, https://aapa.files.cmsplus.com/

SeminarPresentations/07_FACENG_Johansen_

Robert.pdf

Jordan, Michael, 2013, “Evolution of STS Cranes”,

World Port Development, May.

Kim, Kap Hwan and Hoon Lee, 2009, Trends and

Future Challenges, Chapter 2, Container Terminal

Operations: Current, https://www.springer.

com/978-3-319-11890-1

Lashkari, S., Wu, Y., and Petering E.H., M., 2017,

Sequencing duel spreader crane operations:

Mathematical formulation and heuristic algorithm.

European Journal of Operational Research. Edition

, 521-534.

Lind, Derrick, Jonathan K. Hsieh and Michael A.

Jordan, 2007, Tandem-40 Docking Container

Crane and Their Impact on Terminals, Liftech, ASCE

Ports 2007 Conference, San Diego, CA. https://

www.liftech.net/wpcontent/uploads/2013/03/

Tandem-40-Dockside-Container-Cranes-and-

Their-Impact-on-Terminals-Paper.pdf

Louppova Julia , 2016, A 6-at-a-time spreader

to handle empties, Port Today, November 3.

https://port.today/a6-at-a-time-spreader-to-

handle-empties/

MAREX, 2016, New System Promises Faster

Handling for Empties. https://maritime-executive.

com/article/newsystem-promises-faster-

handling-for-empties

OECD/ITF, 2015, The impact of Mega-ships,

International Transportation Forum

Perina, O., & Barrons, A., 2015, Terminal

Productivity: Optimizing the operational frontline.

Port Technology, 66, A u g u s t ,

Retrieved from https://www.porttechnology.

org/technical_papers/terminal_productivity_

optimizing_the_operational_front_line

Port of Rotterdam, (2015, APM Terminals

Rotterdam the most productive terminal in Europe,

September 14, Retrieved from https://www.

portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-

releases/apm-terminals-rotterdam-themost-

productive-terminal-in-europe

Sea Trade Maritime News, 2018, Infrastructure

costs need to be considered in building 24,000

teu boxships, https://www.seatrade-maritime.

com/news/asia/infrastructure-costs-need-to-

be-considered-in-building-24000-teuboxships.

html

Soderberg Erik, Michael Jordan and Simo Hoite,

, Concept High Productivity STS Cranes,

Liftech Consulting Corp., ASCE Copri Ports 2016

Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Song, J., n.d., Tandem operation and double

cycling in container terminals. Port Technology:

Edition 51. Retrieved from https://www.

porttechnology.org/ technical_papers/ tandem_

operation_ and_double_cycling_in_container_

termina ls

Tierney, K., S. Voß, R. Stahlbock, 2013,

A mathematical model of inter-terminal

transportation. Technical report, IT University of

Copenhagen, Rotterdam.

van, Marle, Gavin, 2015, Top 20 Ports: The

productivity challenge, Container shipping

trade, Lloyds Register, Sept. 04 https://www.

containerst.com/news/view,top-20-ports-the-

productivity-challenge_39089.htm

Wikipedia, 2017, List of largest container ships,

https://wikivisually.com /wiki/List_of_largest_

container_ships

World Cargo News, 2007, Container crane

productivity and double cycling debate, July

Yahalom, Shmuel Z. and Changqian Guan, 2016,

“Containership Port Time: The Bay Time Factor,”

Maritime Economics & Logistics, ISSN: 1388-

, December, pp 1-17, online: September 12,

(DOI: 10.1057/s41278-016-0044-6).

Yahalom, Shmuel Z. and Changqian Guan, 2017,

“Containership Bay Time and Crane Productivity:

Are They on the Path of Convergence?”

International Association of Maritime Economists,

, Kyoto, Japan, June, 27-30.

Yi, Lin, Li Zhiyong, Tian Xiaofeng,(2016,

Comparison and Selection of Twin 40 Quay

Crane for Automated Terminal, Port & Waterway

Engineering, No. 9, 519, September, https://

www.ramspreaders.com0/wpcontent/

uploads/2016/10/TANDEM-LIFT-ARTICLE.pdf

Zhang, H. P., & Kim, K. H., 2009, Maximizing the

number of dual-cycle operations of quay cranes

in container terminals. Computers & Industrial

Engineering, 56(3), 979–992.

ZPMC, n.d, Semi-automatic, https://

www.nauticexpo.com/prod/zpmc/

product-30643-416383.html

ZPMC, n.d., Spreaders. Retrieved from https://

www.zpmcspreader.com/english




DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21622/MARLOG.2023.12.1.024

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Shmuel Z. Yahalom, Changqian Guan, Elizabeth Langmaid

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The International Maritime Transport and Logistics Journal (MARLOG)

E-ISSN: 2974-3141
P-ISSN: 2974-3133

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt