Structural preprocessing and feature alignment for optimizing CTGAN-based synthetic generation from South African Global Health Observatory data

Junior Vela Vela, Prabhakar Rontala Subramaniam, Japheth K. Mursi, Kolitsoe Sehapi

Abstract


High-fidelity synthetic data generation is a critical prerequisite for addressing data scarcity and privacy constraints in global health. While Conditional Tabular Generative Adversarial Networks (CTGANs) are established in synthesising patient-level electronic health records (EHRs), their performance on aggregate, high-variance transnational health indicators remains underexplored. This study introduces the Structural Preprocessing and Feature Alignment (SPFA) Framework, a novel, preprocessing-centric pipeline designed to optimise CTGAN performance for aggregate indicators. By evaluating the efficacy of the SPFA Framework in synthesising WHO Global Health Observatory data for South Africa, the research shifts the generative modelling focus from clinical settings toward the macro-level health surveillance domain.

The SPFA Framework implements a five-stage hierarchical pipeline incorporating automated type-safe null handling, per-indicator IQR-based outlier capping, dual-criterion cardinality reduction, and Log1p normalisation to mitigate heteroskedasticity. This approach was evaluated through a multi-criterion fidelity assessment, integrating SDV structural quality scores, statistical descriptor proximity, visual density histograms, and Pearson correlation preservation. The SPFA-optimised CTGAN achieved acceptable-to-good statistical fidelity across all dimensions, demonstrating strong marginal distributional alignment (SDV Column Shape ≥ 0.85) and accurate preservation of inter-feature relationships (Pearson correlation difference < 0.02). Notably, the mean and standard deviation of synthetic values differed from real-world data by only -5.81% and +1.27%, respectively. While minor divergence was observed in the upper quartile distributions, the pipeline successfully addressed the high cardinality and skewness inherent in South African health indicators. These results validate the SPFA Framework as a robust, reproducible methodology for public health. By demonstrating that structural alignment is a primary determinant of synthesis quality, comparable in influence to hyperparameter tuning, this study provides a scalable pathway for enhancing data utility in global health surveillance and evidence-based policy modelling.

 

Received 29 July 2026

Accepted 24 September 2026

Published 04 October 2026


Keywords


Synthetic Data, CTGAN, WHO Global Health Observatory, Structural Preprocessing and Feature Alignment, Health Surveillance, South Africa

Full Text:

PDF

References


PARIS21, “Progress report 2024. PARIS21 Secretariat,” OECD, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.paris21.org/sites/default/files/media/document/2025-03/progress-report-2025.pdf

K. P. Junaid, T. Kiran, M. Gupta, K. Kishore, and S. Siwatch, “How Much Missing Data Is Too Much to Impute for Longitudinal Health Indicators? A Preliminary Guideline for the Choice of the Extent of Missing Proportion to Impute With Multiple Imputation by Chained Equations,” Population Health Metrics, vol. 23, no. 1, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12963-025-00364-2.

D. Fraisl, L. See, D. Estevez, N. Tomaska, and S. MacFeely, “Citizen Science for Monitoring the Health and Well-Being Related Sustainable Development Goals and the World Health Organization’s Triple Billion Targets,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 11, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1202188.

I. J. Goodfellow et al., “Generative Adversarial Nets,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 27, 2014.

M. Giuffrè and D. L. Shung, “Harnessing the Power of Synthetic Data in Healthcare: Innovation, Application, and Privacy,” npj Digital Medicine, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–8, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00927-3.

A. Gonzales, G. Guruswamy, and S. R. Smith, “Synthetic Data in Health Care: A Narrative Review,” PLOS Digital Health, vol. 2, no. 1, p. e0000082, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000082.

V. C. Pezoulas et al., “Synthetic Data Generation Methods in Healthcare: A Review on Open-Source Tools and Methods,” Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, vol. 23, pp. 2892–2910, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.07.005.

L. Xu, M. Skoularidou, A. Cuesta-Infante, and K. Veeramachaneni, “Modeling Tabular Data Using Conditional GAN,” Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, pp. 7333–7343, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/254ed7d2de3b23ab10936522dd547b78-Abstract.html

Z. Lin, A. Khetan, G. C. Fanti, and S. Oh, “PacGAN: The Power of Two Samples in Generative Adversarial Networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 31, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1712.04086.

N. Patki, R. Wedge, and K. Veeramachaneni, “The Synthetic Data Vault,” in 2016 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), Oct. 2016, pp. 399–410.

S. Moronta, “Generating, Comparing and Evaluating Synthetic Tabular Data With SDV,” Medium. Accessed: Feb. 03, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://medium.com/towards-data-engineering/generating-comparing-and-evaluating-synthetic-tabular-data-with-sdv-1198e97c8603

A. Figueira and B. Vaz, “Survey on Synthetic Data Generation, Evaluation Methods and GANs,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 15, p. 2733, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10152733.

J. Fonseca and F. Bacao, “Tabular and Latent Space Synthetic Data Generation: A Literature Review,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 115, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40537-023-00792-7.

I. Gulrajani, F. Ahmed, M. Arjovsky, V. Dumoulin, and A. Courville, “Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017.

L. Xu and K. Veeramachaneni, “Synthesizing Tabular Data Using Generative Adversarial Networks,” arXiv (Cornell University), Nov. 2018, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1811.11264.

A. V. Solatorio and O. Dupriez, “REaLTabFormer: Generating Realistic Relational and Tabular Data Using Transformers,” arXiv.org. Accessed: Sep. 28, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.02041

A. Kotelnikov, D. Baranchuk, I. Rubachev, and A. Babenko, “TabDDPM: Modelling Tabular Data With Diffusion Models,” in International conference on machine learning , PMLR, Jul. 2023, pp. 17564–17579. Accessed: Sep. 28, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/kotelnikov23a.html

M. Hernandez, G. Epelde, A. Alberdi, R. Cilla, and D. Rankin, “Synthetic Data Generation for Tabular Health Records: A Systematic Review,” Neurocomputing, vol. 493, pp. 28–45, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.053.

D. G. Mwigereri et al., “Synthetic Data Generation of Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems Data: A Case Study in a Low- and Middle-Income Country,” JAMIA Open, vol. 8, no. 6, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf137.

O. Parise, R. Kronenberger, G. Parise, C. de Asmundis, S. Gelsomino, and M. La Meir, “CTGAN-driven Synthetic Data Generation: A Multidisciplinary, Expert-Guided Approach (TIMA),” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 259, p. 108523, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108523.

M. L. Fang, D. S. Dhami, and K. Kersting, “DP-CTGAN: Differentially Private Medical Data Generation Using CTGANs,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2022), LNCS, pp. 178–188, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-09342-5_17.

B. Kaabachi et al., “A Scoping Review of Privacy and Utility Metrics in Medical Synthetic Data,” npj Digital Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 60, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01359-3.

M. Hernandez, P. A. Osorio-Marulanda, M. Catalina, L. Loinaz, G. Epelde, and N. Aginako, “Comprehensive Evaluation Framework for Synthetic Tabular Data in Health: Fidelity, Utility and Privacy Analysis of Generative Models With and Without Privacy Guarantees,” Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 7, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1576290.

M. Alqulaity and P. Yang, “Enhanced Conditional GAN for High-Quality Synthetic Tabular Data Generation in Mobile-Based Cardiovascular Healthcare,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 23, p. 7673, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24237673.

J. Snoke, G. M. Raab, B. Nowok, C. Dibben, and Aleksandra Slavkovic, “General and Specific Utility Measures for Synthetic Data,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 663–688, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1111/rssa.12358.

van Breugel, H. Sun, Z. Qian, and van, “Membership Inference Attacks Against Synthetic Data Through Overfitting Detection,” arXiv (Cornell University), Jan. 2023, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2302.12580.

V. S. Chundawat, A. K. Tarun, M. Mandal, M. Lahoti, and P. Narang, “A Universal Metric for Robust Evaluation of Synthetic Tabular Data,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 300–309, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1109/tai.2022.3229289.

D. Susser et al., “Synthetic Health Data: Real Ethical Promise and Peril,” Hastings Center Report, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 8–13, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1002/hast.4911.

V. B. Vallevik et al., “Can I Trust My Fake Data – a Comprehensive Quality Assessment Framework for Synthetic Tabular Data in Healthcare,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 185, p. 105413, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105413.

WHO, “Global Health Observatory data repository.,” Who.int. Accessed: Feb. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/data/gho

A. Zaveri, J. Lehmann, S. Auer, M. M. Hassan, M. A. Sherif, and M. Martin, “Publishing and Interlinking the Global Health Observatory Dataset,” Semantic Web, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 315–322, 2013, doi: 10.3233/sw-130102.

L. Zhao et al., “Data Gaps Towards Health Development Goals, 47 Low- and Middle-Income Countries,” Bulletin of the World Health Organization, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 40–49, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.2471/blt.21.286254.

United Nations Statistics Division, “The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2024: Unlocking the power of data for sustainable development.,” unstats.un.org. Accessed: Feb. 02, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2024/

P. Yadav et al., “Rigorous Experimental Analysis of Tabular Data Generated Using TVAE and CTGAN,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 15, no. 4, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.14569/ijacsa.2024.01504125.

K. Kuo, “Generative Synthesis of Insurance Datasets,” arXiv.org. Accessed: Sep. 28, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.02423

Z. Qian, T. Callender, B. Cebere, S. M. Janes, N. Navani, and van, “Synthetic Data for Privacy-Preserving Clinical Risk Prediction,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72894-y.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21622/ACE.2026.06.2.2356

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Junior Vela Vela, Prabhakar Rontala Subramaniam, Japheth K Mursi, Kolitsoe Sehapi


Advances in Computing and Engineering

E-ISSN: 2735-5985

P-ISSN: 2735-5977

 

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt

ace@aast.edu