A scoping review of adopter attributes, motivations, and barriers of solar home systems adoption: Lessons for sub-Saharan Africa

Tiyamike Ngonda

Abstract


The diffusion of solar home systems in sub-Saharan Africa would reduce the prevalent energy poverty in the region. However, the adoption of solar home systems faces significant barriers that have hampered the adoption process. This paper presents a scoping review that investigates non-institutional factors influencing the SHS diffusion process. The study searched three databases, Scopus, ScienceDirect and Web of Science, for conference papers and journal articles that focused on barriers and motivations for adopting solar home systems. The search produced 116 records. After applying the exclusion criteria, 14 papers were included in the thematic analysis. The analysis revealed that affordability and inadequate information on solar home systems are significant barriers to adoption. The analysis further showed that solar home system adopters, typically highly skilled and educated high-income individuals, are motivated by the peer effect, energy security and independence, monetary saving and desire to protect the environment. Finally, the findings suggest that government intervention is essential for the widespread diffusion of solar home systems in sub-Saharan Africa.

 

Received: 26 December 2021

Accepted: 03 February 2022

Published: 27 April 2022


Keywords


Barriers; Diffusion; Motivations; Photovoltaic; Solar home systems; Sub-Saharan Africa

Full Text:

PDF

References


United Nations, “Sustainable development goals: Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy.” https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/energy/ (accessed Dec. 19, 2021).

P. Bojek and H. Bahar, “Solar PV,” Paris, Nov. 2021. Accessed: Nov. 30, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/solar-pv

H. Ritchie and M. Roser, “Energy,” Our World in Data, 2010. https://ourworldindata.org/energy (accessed Nov. 30, 2021).

S. Baurzhan and G. P. Jenkins, “Off-grid solar PV: Is it an affordable or appropriate solution for rural electrification in Sub-Saharan African countries?,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 60. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 1405–1418, Jul. 01, 2016. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.016

F. Zhang, In the Dark: How Much Do Power Sector Distortions Cost South Asia? Washington, DC: Washington, DC: World Bank, 2019. doi: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1154-8

A. Babajide and M. C. Brito, “Solar PV systems to eliminate or reduce the use of diesel generators at no additional cost: A case study of Lagos, Nigeria,” Renewable Energy, vol. 172, pp. 209–218, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.088

P. Balcombe, D. Rigby, and A. Azapagic, “Investigating the importance of motivations and barriers related to microgeneration uptake in the UK,” Applied Energy, vol. 130, pp. 403–418, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.05.047

ESMAP, “Global photovoltaic power potential by country,” Washington, Sep. 2020. Accessed: Dec. 02, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://globalsolaratlas.info/global-pv-potential-study

C. S. Guno, C. B. Agaton, R. O. Villanueva, and R. O. Villanueva, “Optimal investment strategy for solar PV integration in residential buildings: A case study in the Philippines,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 79–89, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.14710/ijred.2021.32657

A. I. Ugulu and C. Aigbayboa, “Motives for solar photovoltaic (PV) adoption in urban Nigeria,” in IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Nov. 2019, vol. 385, no. 1. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/385/1/012012

S. Selvakkumaran and E. O. Ahlgren, “Determining the factors of household energy transitions: A multi-domain study,” Technology in Society, vol. 57, pp. 54–75, May 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.12.003

T. M. Qureshi, K. Ullah, and M. J. Arentsen, “Factors responsible for solar PV adoption at household level: A case of Lahore, Pakistan,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 78, pp. 754–763, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.020

I. U. Khalil, A. Khattak, and M. U. Ahsan, “Solar PV adoption for homes (A case of Peshawar, Pakistan),” in 2017 International Symposium on Recent Advances in Electrical Engineering (RAEE), Oct. 2017, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/RAEE.2017.8246035

A. M. Tanner and A. L. Johnston, “The impact of rural electric access on deforestation rates,” World Development, vol. 94, pp. 174–185, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.046

V. Kizilcec and P. Parikh, “Solar home systems: A comprehensive literature review for Sub-Saharan Africa,” Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 58. Elsevier B.V., pp. 78–89, Oct. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2020.07.010

H. Arksey and L. O’Malley, “Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–32, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative data analysis: A methods source book, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2013.

A. C. Tricco et al., “PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, no. 7. American College of Physicians, pp. 467–473, Oct. 02, 2018. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

T. N. Do, P. J. Burke, K. G. H. Baldwin, and C. T. Nguyen, “Underlying drivers and barriers for solar photovoltaics diffusion: The case of Vietnam,” Energy Policy, vol. 144, p. 111561, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111561

M. G. Fikru, “Determinants of electricity bill savings for residential solar panel adopters in the U.S.: A multilevel modeling approach,” Energy Policy, vol. 139, p. 111351, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111351

R. Ford et al., “Emerging energy transitions: PV uptake beyond subsidies,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 117, pp. 138–150, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.007

M. Graziano, M. Fiaschetti, and C. Atkinson-Palombo, “Peer effects in the adoption of solar energy technologies in the United States: An urban case study,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 48, pp. 75–84, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.002

S. Karjalainen and H. Ahvenniemi, “Pleasure is the profit: The adoption of solar PV systems by households in Finland,” Renewable Energy, vol. 133, pp. 44–52, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.011

A. Palm, “Peer effects in residential solar photovoltaics adoption: A mixed methods study of Swedish users,” Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 26, pp. 1–10, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.01.008

J. Palm and E. Eriksson, “Residential solar electricity adoption: how households in Sweden search for and use information,” Energy, Sustainability and Society, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 14, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1186/s13705-018-0156-1

V. Rai and S. A. Robinson, “Effective information channels for reducing costs of environmentally- friendly technologies: evidence from residential PV markets,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 014044, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014044

V. Rai, D. C. Reeves, and R. Margolis, “Overcoming barriers and uncertainties in the adoption of residential solar PV,” Renewable Energy, vol. 89, pp. 498–505, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.11.080

K. K. Zander, “Unrealised opportunities for residential solar panels in Australia,” Energy Policy, vol. 142, p. 111508, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111508

G. Adwek et al., “The solar energy access in Kenya: a review focusing on Pay-As-You-Go solar home system,” Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 22, no. 5. Springer, pp. 3897–3938, Jun. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00372-x

P. Yadav, A. P. Heynen, and D. Palit, “Pay-As-You-Go financing: A model for viable and widespread deployment of solar home systems in rural India,” Energy for Sustainable Development, vol. 48, pp. 139–153, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2018.12.005




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21622/resd.2022.08.1.001

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Tiyamike Ngonda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development

E-ISSN: 2356-8569

P-ISSN: 2356-8518

 

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt

resd@aast.edu