Sustainability and Conserved Energy Value of Heritage Buildings

Dalia Elsorady

Abstract


Conservation and sustainability have long shared fundamental goals. Heritage buildings are basically sustainable and will continue to be if their sound construction and superior materials are conserved properly. Despite this fact, heritage buildings have gained a reputation for being inefficient and therefore unsustainable in the face of modern, energy-efficient structures. As a result, models which are measured embodied energy arose to advocate the retention of heritage structures over new constructions. The initial need to measure energy capital in buildings started due to rising needs to save energy and address global sustainability goals. Both responses measure overall energy efficiency of heritage buildings by attempting to account for the "energy capital." The life cycle assessment/avoided-impacts model is another model that acts as a response to the evolving metrics and currency of sustainability. The Conservation Green Lab has further developed the capabilities of the life cycle assessment/ avoided impacts model in 2012  in its innovative report: “The Greenest Building: Quantifying the Environmental Value of Building Reuse”. With this aim, the study applies energy software models supported by guidelines laid out by LEED, and are consistent with judicious conservation practice on a case study heritage building in Alexandria. The outcome revealed proves that heritage buildings can be both sustainable and energy efficient while maintaining their historic integrity, when dealt with properly.

Keywords


Sustainability; Embodied energy; Heritage Conservation; LEED; Life Cycle Assessment; Energy value

Full Text:

PDF

References


United States Energy Information Administration. “Annual Energy Review 2011.” September 2012.

Available at

http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/annual/pdf/aer.pdf. (Accessed 02 May, 2016).

United Nations, The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992, United Nations Conference on environment and Development, Rio de Janiero, Brazil. Reprinted in Sustainable Development Reader edited by Stephen M. Wheeler and Timothy Beatley. New York: Routledge, 2004.

D. Rodwell, Conservation and Sustainability in Historic Cities, U.K.: Blackwell publishing Ltd, 2007.

G. Treloar, Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input-Output Tables: Towards an Input-Output-Based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method. Economic Systems Research,Taylor and Francis.Vol. 9(4), 1997, pp. 375-91.

D. Rypkema and K. Wiehagen, Dollars and Sense of Historic Preservation. The Economic Benefits of Preserving Philadelphia’s Past. Washington D.C.: National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2000.

G. Ashworth, Conservation Designation and the Revaluation of Property: the risk of heritage innovation, International Journal of Heritage Studies, 8(1), 2002, pp. 9- 23.

D. A. Elsorady, The economic value of heritage properties in Alexandria, Egypt, International Journal of Heritage Studies, Volume 20, Issue 2, 2014, pp. 107-122.

M. Wishkoski, Historic Preservation Projects can be Green, 2006. Available at

http://www.djc.com/news/en/11177209.html (Accessed 13 March, 2016).

V. Bahl, Ethics of Adaptive Reuse. Architectural Week.No.240, 2005, B1.1-B1.2.

C. Langston and L. Shen, Application of the Adaptive Reuse Potential Model in Hong Kong A Case Study of Lui Seng Shun, International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 11, 2007, pp. 193-207.

C. Griffin and P. Jr., Energy Conservation in Buildings: Techniques for Economical Design, Washington, D.C.: The Construction Specifications Institute, Inc., 1974.

M. Jackson, “Embodied Energy and Historic Preservation: A Needed Reassessment”, Association for Preservation Technology36, no. 4, 2005, pp. 47-52.

Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/4003163.(Accessed March 4, 2016).

A. Booz, and H. Booz, Assessing the Energy Conservation Benefits of Historic Preservation: Methods and Examples, U.S.: Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, 1979.

C. Carter, “Assessing Energy Conservation Benefits: A Study” in New Energy Old Buildings,ed. National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington, D.C.: Preservation Press, 1981.

U.S. Green Building Council. “About USGBC.”

Available at http://new.usgbc.org/about.(Accessed January 10, 2016).

C. Elefante, “The Greenest Building Is…One That Is Already Built,” Forum Journal: The Journal of the National Trust for Historic Preservation 21, no. 4 (2007), pp. 26-37.

W. Trusty, “Renovating Vs. Building New: The Environmental Merits.” Canada: The Athena Institute, 2007.

Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, A Life Cycle Assessment Study of Embodied Effects For Existing Historic Buildings, CA: Parks Canada, 2009.

M. Lucuik, W. Trusty, A. Huffman and A. Prefasi, The Greenest Building Is the One That Is Never Built: A Life-Cycle Assessment Study of Embodied Effects for Historic Buildings, ASHRAE, Buildings XI, Canada, 2010.

Preservation Green Lab, The Greenest Building: Quantifying the Environmental Value of Building Reuse, Washington, D.C.: The National Trust for Historic Preservation, 2012.

C. Stein, Greening Modernism, New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2010.

National Trust for Historic Preservation - The greenest Building website

Available at http://www.thegreenestbuilding.org (Accessed January 10, 2016).

United States Department of Energy, 2010 Buildings Energy Data Book. Prepared for the Building Technologies Program Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy by D&R International, Ltd. Under contract to Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, March 2011.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation, “About Us”.

Available at http//www.preservationnation.org/about-us (Accessed February 2, 2016).

Whole Building Design Guide.“Sustainable Historic Preservation.”WBDG Historic Preservation Subcommittee. Available at

http://www.wbdg.org/resources/sustainable_hp.php.(Accessed January 10, 2016).

United States Environmental Protection Agency. “Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).”Available at http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/std/lca/lca.html.(Accessed March 2, 2016).

Athena Sustainable Materials Institute, Athena EcoCalculator, Available at

http://www.athenasmi.org/our-software-data/ecocalculator/ (Accessed April 18, 2016).

K. Weeks and A. Grimmer, The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for the treatment of Historic

Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring and Reconstructing Historic Buildings, Washington D.C: U.S Department of the Interior, 1995, pp. 56-57.

B. Campagna, “How Changes to LEED Will Benefit Existing and Historic Buildings,” Forum News,15, 2008.

English Heritage, “Who We Are”,

Available at http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/server/show/nav.1665.(Accessed March 4, 2016).

Egyptian Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy

Available at http://www.moee.gov.eg(Accessed March 4, 2016).

ALEX-MED, Alexandria Heritage Catalogue 2007, Alexandria: Bibliotheca Alexandrina, 2007.

Interview with rehabilitation consultant, March 2016).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21622/resd.2017.03.1.104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Dalia Elsorady

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Renewable Energy and Sustainable Development

E-ISSN: 2356-8569

P-ISSN: 2356-8518

 

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt

resd@aast.edu