Autonmous surface ships, in view of existing legislation, and the need for a new governance

Agamy Kazem, Helal Hesham

Abstract


The race of autonomous vehicles is moving with fast leaps either on land, airborne, underwater and recently waterborne as well. Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships are expected to make its first test on 2018 in Finland. The first commercial vessel is M/V Yara Birkeland, first she intended to operate with minimal crew before turning to fully autonomous on 2018. The main issue concerning the applicability of Autonomous ship and the introduction to the maritime industry is not related to technicality, as a big percentage of technical knowledge already exists, but is related to the legal and regulatory framework which will govern and regulate the operational aspects.

The main issue to concentrate on is liability issues, both financial and criminal liability. Though financial liability will be solved without much of a change, sadly a higher value of compensation will be involved. It will make insurers more reluctant to give the same existing terms as of the conventional ships, because there will be no one onboard to intervene in case of machinery failure, which is a weak point in comparison with crewed ships, but in the end, it will be adjusted to a higher insurance premium.

This paper discusses the real complication related to criminal liability which results from collision cases developing to death of crew, where the punishment may include imprisonment. How can the punishment be imposed, if there is no Captain onboard to arrest, and the supposed to be Captain is sitting thousands of miles away in a control center and responsible for possibly more than one ship at a time. In addition, it aims to explore the expected conflict of law due to the integration of Autonomous ship into maritime industry.

Keywords: autonomous surface ship, criminal liability, financial, conflict of law, control center.


Full Text:

PDF

References


IMO (2010). ISM Code and Guidelines on Implementation of the ISM Code 2010. Available online. Accessed 30.7.2017 at: http://www.imo.org/OurWork/HumanElement/SafetyManagement/Pages/ISMCode.aspx.

ABS, (2004). American Bureau of Shipping: Corporate Technology Division, Safety Assessment and Human Factors Department, Review and Analysis of Accident Databases: 1991–2002 Data Technical Report, 2003-5.1, March, 2004, retrieved from http://www.eagle.org/news/TECH/Marine/SAHF2003.pdf access date: 5.8.013

Primorac, B.B. & Parunov, J., (2016). Review of statistical data on ship accidents. In: G.S. & Santos (eds.). Marine Technology and Engineering 3. London: Taylor & Francis Group

Lloyds Register, 2016. Cyber-enabled ships: Deploying information and communications technology in ship-ping – Lloyds Register's approach to assurance. London: Lloyds Register.

Hammer, Helle (2017). IMO undertakes regulatory scoping exercise on autonomous ships. International Union of Marine Insurance, Issue 18 September 2017, P 3

Roos, Ninna & Sandell, P. Ivar (2016). Captain´s duty – The constant and continuing changes of captain´s legal position. How can we ensure that Masters are on map? IAMU AGA17 proceeding, pp 158 – 163

Hard, Douglas A. (2016). Standardization and Simplification for Teaching the International Collision Regulations [72COLREGS]. IAMU AGA17 proceeding, pp 164 – 168

Mast, M., et al., (2016). Autonomous sailing: Safety, Liability and Legislation. Rotterdam Mainport University of Applied Sciences. Project

Lazarowska, A., 2017. A new deterministic approach in a decision support system for ship's trajectory plan-ning. Expert Systems with Applications, volume 71, pp. 469-478

Norton v. Warner Co., 321 U.S. 565 (1944). Retrieved at December 2017 from: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/321/565/case.html

The Hague Rules as Amended by the Brussels Protocol, (1968). Retrieved at December 2017 from: http://www.jus.uio.no/lm/sea.carriage.hague.visby.rules.1968/doc.html)

Barlow v. Liberty Maritime Corp., 746 F.3d 518 at 528 (2d Cir. 2014). Retrieved at November 2017 from: https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20140304090

Francesca Morris, December 18, 2006, Seaworthiness under U.S. Law. Retrieved at Dec. 2017 from: https://www.hklaw.com/publications/Seaworthiness-Under-US-Law-12-18-2006/




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21622/MARLOG.2018.07.818

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Agamy Kazem, Helal Hesham

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

The International Maritime Transport and Logistics Journal (MARLOG)

E-ISSN: 2974-3141
P-ISSN: 2974-3133

Published by:

Academy Publishing Center (APC)

Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)

Alexandria, Egypt